Focusing on drafting using the materials that you have gathered this far is an important part of the writing process. Each step taken to further the editing and revising of an essay will make it that much more polished as a final draft. Just as in most projects at work, there are steps to follow to produce a satisfactory final product in academic papers.
Review instructor feedback on your Week 1 to Week 3 assignments. (Still waiting on instructor to finish grading my week 3 assignment to provide feedback, once received will attach document)
Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word draft of your comparison-contrast paper that makes seeing the differences and similarities of your chosen topics clear.
Use the topic you selected in Week 1, your research from Week 2, and your thesis and outline from Week 3.
Review your essay for effective use of basic English grammar, word usage, and sentence style before turning in your paper.
Answer the following on the last page of your submission:
Often we have questions or uncertainties about our own writing, but when an instructor returns comments or grade they don't address what we ourselves wondered or worried about. What questions would you like me specifically to answer about your rough draft? You must ask at least one question, and try to limit the questons to no more than three.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.
Running head: BIBLIOGRAPHY 1 Instructors Feedback: Michael, in reviewing your assignment, I have discovered that much
of of it has been taken word-for-word from sources without proper quotation marks or
source in-text citations . Even if you did put quote marks around those words or even if
you paraphrased them, it still would be a failing paper because you did not write,
organize or develop the assignment yourself. You were to write a summary of the
sources, evaluate their credibility and explain how you intended to use them Also,
summaries are to be written in your own words. Review the student sample. Further, no
more than 10-15 per cent of any assignment can be quotes even if cited properly. This
is considered plagiarism. Below is a copy of your paper with the plagiarized passages
highlighted: Plagiarism is a serious offense in my classroom and at UoPX; when you
plagiarize, you are in violation of the Student Code of Academic Integrity. Here are
some things you should know: ? Whenever you use two or more words from a source,
you MUST enclose the words in quotation marks, and you MUST cite the correct
source. ? This is true no matter what the source is: the textbook, a website, or anything
else. ? Changing a few words here and there or adding a word in here and there does
NOT change the fact that this is plagiarism. Please reread all my posts in the
discussions, especially the ?Is this plagiarism activity? and the fun and helpful APA
videos. Your grade for the paper will be a zero, and I will be filing a report with Academic
Affairs. I would like to hear from you and give you a chance to explain how this
happened before I file my report, however, so I'll watch for your response in the next 48
hours. Any response you make will be included in my report. Academic Affairs always
has the final say on these matters. . I will watch for your reply. 2 Annotated Bibliography
Michael P. Cabanayan
Transactional Leaders Vs. Transformational Leaders
University of Phoenix
Professor Kim Karaff 3
The topic of the essay chosen from week one is a persuasive essay about Transactional
Leader Vs. Transformational Leader to depict which presidential candidate is most qualified
to be elected as President and to distinguish the category Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump
fall under. Barbuto, J. E. Jr. (2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational
leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4),
26-40. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/203138752?accountid=12085
Dr. Barbuto is the Director of the Center for Leadership at California State University at
Fullerton and is an associate professor of organizational behavior in leadership for the
Department of management at my Mihaylo College of Business and Economics. Dr.
Barbuto earned his PhD in business administration from the University of Rhode Island, an
MBA from Bentley University in a BS in business administration from the University of
Maine. The focus of Barbuto's peer-reviewed article is to examine the distinguishing
characteristics between transformational and charismatic leadership behaviors based on
variable criteria. These behaviors were significantly correlated based on transformational
and charismatic analytical breakdowns. The use of intrinsic process motivation showed a
correlation with transformational leadership behaviors, indicating that the transformational
leaders that motivated their staff by enjoyment at work were more likely to self report an
ideology consistent with both charismatic and transformational leadership behaviors. It is
noted that overall motivation has provided clear evidence for the promise as a decedent to a
full range of leadership models. The results of this article have some selection and
leadership development implications for example, particular leadership styles such as
transformational, are sought out by organizations that are seeking to enhance the internal
environmental culture of their organization and staff. It should be noted that the article
cautioned practitioners do not overestimate the significance of a leader?s source of
motivation for their particular leadership style. The results from the article's research
provide several our communities for future research on the relationship between motivation
and leadership style. More rigorous research procedures will also improve on this topic. The
article concluded, citing that its results were consistent with the Kegan's 1982 study of the
constructive developmental view of human motivation and how it is impacted by leadership
formation and development. Having been authored by a professional in behavioral
leadership, Dr Barbuto, the source is not only credible but also adheres to the rules of formal
writing. The articles credibility is also enhanced by the fact that it also adheres to the format
of academic journal papers having a well organized structure that details its methodology.
Finally, it acknowledges numerous sources from which primary arguments are drawn.
Guay, R. P. (2013). The relationship between leader fit and transformational leadership. Journal
of Managerial Psychology, 28(1), 55-73. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02683941311298869
Dr. Guay received a BS in management from Northern Illinois University, an MBA from
Northern Illinois University, and a PhD in organizational behavior/human resources from 4
the University of Iowa. Guay is currently an assistant professor in the Department of
management at the University of Northern Iowa. The purpose of Guay?s peer-reviewed
article was to further examine the antecedents of transformational leadership by examining
gaps in the literature that concentrate on the relationship between transformational
leadership behaviors and the leader fit within an organization. His research determined that
demands-abilities fit is positively related to transformational leadership, while personorganization fit produced a negative relationship. Furthermore the research indicated
leadership effectiveness was directly related to transformational leadership behaviors. Guay
noted that researchers should use caution when interpreting the results. In addition, he noted
additional experimental research is required to duplicate these findings. Additionally, to the
author?s knowledge this is the first study of its type. The author of the article is an authority
in the subject matter having pursued organizational management to the level of a PHD. The
article clearly outlines its methodology and follows a formal structure of a research journal
paper. The article also delves into a research question not dealt with previously thereby
adding to the existing bank of knowledge and meets the requirements of a research article.
Finally, it gives credit to previous works by alluding to them and citing them appropriately.
Its publication in the journal of leadership and organizational studies underscores its
reliability and authoritative nature.
Parolini, J., Patterson, K., & Winston, B. (2009). Distinguishing between transformational and
servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(3), 274-291.
Parolini holds a degree from Regent University in Virginia Beach, Virginia and currently
owns and operates her own consulting business in Chanhassen, Minnesota. Patterson
received a degree from Regent University in Virginia Beach, Virginia and currently teaches
for the School of Global Leadership and Entrepreneurship at the same Regent University.
Winston received a BA in psychology from the University of Alaska and a BS in printing
management technology from the Rochester Institute of technology, holds masters degrees
in both communication and business administration and is currently pursuing a PhD at
Virginia Commonwealth University and currently teaches currently teaches for the School
of Global Leadership and Entrepreneurship at Regent University in Virginia Beach, VA. the
purpose of the above listed authors peer-reviewed article was to discuss the empirical invest
conditions conducted by Parolini in 2007 on the distinctions between servant and
transformational leadership. Parolini?s 2007 study concluded that transformational leaders
had a different focus for organizational needs, and showed an allegiance towards the
organization, while also influencing the organizational staff with conventional charismatic
approaches as well. In addition, the study also discovered that servant leaders also
differentiated their focus for the needs of the individual staff members while showing them
our nation to serve first, with an allegiance towards individual staff members, while
influencing staff members through nonconventional means such as offering more individual
autonomy. Furthermore, the article discussed the first empirical research study findings on
the distinction between servant and transformational leadership and how the two leadership
have existed had been discussed by scholars and theorists since the 1970s. The article is
written by a consultant in leadership and management matters who dedicates part of his time 5
in research and field work associated with leadership. This makes the details of the article
not only authoritative but also well researched and formulated. The article also adheres to all
requirements of a formal journal research article explaining its publication in the leadership
and organizational development journal. Finally, it gives credit to its primary sources and
incorporates arguments from a number of authorities in the subject matter.
Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card . All your purchases are securely protected by .
About this QuestionSTATUS
Oct 14, 2020EXPERT
We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.
You can also use these solutions:
- As a reference for in-depth understanding of the subject.
- As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
- For editing and paraphrasing (check your institution's definition of plagiarism and recommended paraphrase).
STUCK WITH YOUR PAPER?
Order New Solution. Quick Turnaround
Click on the button below in order to Order for a New, Original and High-Quality Essay Solutions. New orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.
WE GUARANTEE, THAT YOUR PAPER WILL BE WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH AND WITHIN A DEADLINE.